Head-to-head comparison

Audacity vs InShot

Two of the editing tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Free, open-source audio editor that's been the entry point for podcasters for 25 years.

Best for: Indie podcasters on a budget

Popular mobile video editor for vertical podcast clips with a friendly learning curve.

Best for: Easy vertical clips

At a glance

Field
Audacity
InShot
Best for
Indie podcasters on a budget
Easy vertical clips
Price tier
Freeverify
Freemiumverify
Platforms
macOSWindows
iOSAndroid
Audience
Solo creators
Solo creators

The honest trade-offs

Audacity

Pros

  • Free and open source forever
  • Runs on Mac, Windows and Linux
  • Massive bank of community tutorials

Watch-outs

  • Interface feels stuck in the early 2000s
  • Destructive editing model is error-prone
  • No text-based editing or modern AI

InShot

Pros

  • Friendly UI for first-time editors
  • Affordable subscription removes the watermark
  • Quick aspect ratio conversions

Watch-outs

  • Less depth than KineMaster
  • Upsell prompts can be aggressive
  • Not built for long-form video

Which one should you pick?

Pick Audacity if

You’re building around indie podcasters on a budget. Audacity is the default answer to 'how do I edit a podcast for $0' and it's still a perfectly reasonable one. Interface looks like Windows XP, the workflow is fiddly next to modern tools, and the recent ownership change rattled the community — but it's free, runs everywhere, and does the basics well.

Pick InShot if

You’re building around easy vertical clips. InShot is the mobile editor most TikTok creators learned on. For podcasters who just need to slap captions and a music bed onto a vertical clip, it's the fastest tool on a phone.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Audacity alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Audacity do better than InShot?

Audacity's standout is "Free and open source forever". InShot doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Friendly UI for first-time editors" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Audacity; if the second does, pick InShot.

What are the trade-offs?

Audacity: interface feels stuck in the early 2000s. InShot: less depth than kinemaster. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Do they support the same platforms?

Audacity works on macOS, Windows where InShot doesn't. InShot works on iOS, Android where Audacity doesn't. If you're on a specific OS or device, that may decide for you.

Can I use Audacity and InShot together?

Both are editing tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Audacity for one show or episode type and InShot for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.