Head-to-head comparison

Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn vs AutoCap

Two of the captioning tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Open-source Whisper subtitle generator from a video tech firm

Best for: Broadcasters and developers wanting an auditable open-source Whisper pipeline

Mobile-first auto-captioning popular with creators on the go.

Best for: Mobile creators

At a glance

Field
Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn
AutoCap
Best for
Broadcasters and developers wanting an auditable open-source Whisper pipeline
Mobile creators
Price tier
Freeverify
Platforms
Windows
iOSAndroid
Audience
Solo creators
Solo creators

The honest trade-offs

Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn

Pros

  • Maintained by a known video-tech firm
  • Clean codebase for integration
  • Permissive open-source license

Watch-outs

  • Less feature-rich than Subsai
  • CLI only, no GUI
  • Smaller community for troubleshooting

AutoCap

Pros

  • Pro tier is cheap at around $5/month
  • Truly hands-free mobile workflow
  • Multi-language support out of the box

Watch-outs

  • Captions need frequent corrections on jargon
  • Smaller font library than CapCut
  • Mobile-only, no web or desktop version

Which one should you pick?

Pick Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn if

You’re building around broadcasters and developers wanting an auditable open-source whisper pipeline. Auto Subtitles is a smaller open-source Whisper wrapper from Eyevinn, a Swedish video-tech firm. Less feature-rich than Subsai, but the code is cleaner and maintenance comes from a known vendor — useful for organisations that need an auditable dependency in a build pipeline.

Pick AutoCap if

You’re building around mobile creators. AutoCap is the cheap phone captioner you'd hand to someone who films their own clips on an iPhone and just wants captions, not a workflow. Five bucks a month, no watermark, decent fonts.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn do better than AutoCap?

Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn's standout is "Maintained by a known video-tech firm". AutoCap doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Pro tier is cheap at around $5/month" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn; if the second does, pick AutoCap.

What are the trade-offs?

Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn: less feature-rich than subsai. AutoCap: captions need frequent corrections on jargon. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Do they support the same platforms?

Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn works on Windows where AutoCap doesn't. AutoCap works on iOS, Android where Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn doesn't. If you're on a specific OS or device, that may decide for you.

Can I use Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn and AutoCap together?

Both are captioning tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Auto Subtitles by Eyevinn for one show or episode type and AutoCap for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.