Head-to-head comparison

Boomcaster vs WaveLab Cast

Two of the recording tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

4K browser recording that hands every guest a clean WAV.

Best for: Budget remote interviews

Steinberg's podcast-focused audio editor with multitrack recording and direct upload to hosts.

Best for: Steinberg loyalists

At a glance

Field
Boomcaster
WaveLab Cast
Best for
Budget remote interviews
Steinberg loyalists
Price tier
Platforms
Web
macOSWindows
Audience
Solo creatorsSmall teams
Solo creatorsSmall teams

The honest trade-offs

Boomcaster

Pros

  • Local recording with cloud backup safety net
  • Up to 4K video, 48kHz audio
  • Cheaper monthly than Riverside or SquadCast

Watch-outs

  • Guests can't join from mobile browsers
  • Editing and AI features feel thin
  • Smaller user community than competitors

WaveLab Cast

Pros

  • Built on Steinberg's mature audio engine
  • Direct upload to Spreaker, Podbean, SoundCloud
  • 30-day free trial of the full app

Watch-outs

  • Smaller community and fewer tutorials
  • Less narrative-focused than Hindenburg
  • Mac and Windows only

Which one should you pick?

Pick Boomcaster if

You’re building around budget remote interviews. A reasonable Riverside clone at a fairer price — local recording fallback, clean WAVs per guest, cloud backup running in parallel. The gap shows up in polish: thinner AI tooling, smaller ecosystem, and guests can't join from mobile browsers.

Pick WaveLab Cast if

You’re building around steinberg loyalists. WaveLab Cast 2 is the underrated podcast tool from a serious audio company. Same engine as Steinberg's mastering flagship, with direct upload to Spreaker, Podbean, and SoundCloud.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Boomcaster alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Boomcaster do better than WaveLab Cast?

Boomcaster's standout is "Local recording with cloud backup safety net". WaveLab Cast doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Built on Steinberg's mature audio engine" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Boomcaster; if the second does, pick WaveLab Cast.

What are the trade-offs?

Boomcaster: guests can't join from mobile browsers. WaveLab Cast: smaller community and fewer tutorials. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Do they support the same platforms?

Boomcaster works on Web where WaveLab Cast doesn't. WaveLab Cast works on macOS, Windows where Boomcaster doesn't. If you're on a specific OS or device, that may decide for you.

Can I use Boomcaster and WaveLab Cast together?

Both are recording tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Boomcaster for one show or episode type and WaveLab Cast for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.