Head-to-head comparison

Brass Transcripts vs Gladia

Two of the transcription tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Boutique podcast transcription with strict accuracy guarantees.

Best for: Pay-as-you-go podcasters

Multilingual Whisper-powered API with sub-300ms streaming.

Best for: Voice product developers

At a glance

Field
Brass Transcripts
Gladia
Best for
Pay-as-you-go podcasters
Voice product developers
Price tier
Platforms
Web
Web
Audience
Solo creatorsSmall teams
Small teamsAgenciesEnterprise

The honest trade-offs

Brass Transcripts

Pros

  • Pay per file, no subscription
  • Speaker ID included in every file
  • Exports to TXT, SRT, VTT, JSON

Watch-outs

  • 2-hour file limit per upload
  • No editor or collaboration features
  • Narrower language coverage than competitors

Gladia

Pros

  • Sub-300ms real-time latency
  • 100+ languages with code-switching
  • Free 10 hours/month evaluation

Watch-outs

  • API-only, no editor for end users
  • Higher async rate than raw Whisper
  • Volume tiers need annual commits

Which one should you pick?

Pick Brass Transcripts if

You’re building around pay-as-you-go podcasters. Brass Transcripts is a pay-per-file alternative to the subscription transcription world, with speaker ID, four output formats, and a 30-word preview before you pay. A refreshingly simple price tag for podcasters with irregular transcription needs — though there's a 2-hour file limit and no editor, which keeps it firmly in the 'batch tool' category.

Pick Gladia if

You’re building around voice product developers. Gladia took Whisper and re-engineered it to work in production — sub-300ms streaming latency, code-switching across 100+ languages, diarization and translation in the same stream. For developers building voice products it's a serious Whisper-API upgrade.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Brass Transcripts alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Brass Transcripts do better than Gladia?

Brass Transcripts's standout is "Pay per file, no subscription". Gladia doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Sub-300ms real-time latency" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Brass Transcripts; if the second does, pick Gladia.

What are the trade-offs?

Brass Transcripts: 2-hour file limit per upload. Gladia: api-only, no editor for end users. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Can I use Brass Transcripts and Gladia together?

Both are transcription tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Brass Transcripts for one show or episode type and Gladia for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.