Head-to-head comparison

Loopback vs SquadCast

Two of the recording tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Rogue Amoeba's virtual audio router that combines any sources into a single Mac input.

Best for: complex Mac routing

Remote recording with progressive local uploads, now bundled with Descript.

Best for: Reliable remote recording

At a glance

Field
Loopback
SquadCast
Best for
complex Mac routing
Reliable remote recording
Price tier
Platforms
macOS
Web
Audience
Solo creatorsSmall teams
Solo creatorsSmall teamsAgencies

The honest trade-offs

Loopback

Pros

  • Virtual aggregate audio devices done right
  • Pairs perfectly with Audio Hijack
  • One-time license, free trial watermarks audio

Watch-outs

  • $99 is a lot for a routing utility
  • Mac only
  • Overkill for one-mic solo recording

SquadCast

Pros

  • Progressive uploads survive connection drops
  • Separate tracks per participant
  • Bundled with Descript editing in some plans

Watch-outs

  • Standalone identity blurred post-acquisition
  • Video quality trails Riverside slightly
  • Browser-only for guests, no native app

Which one should you pick?

Pick Loopback if

You’re building around complex mac routing. Loopback is the wire-free patch bay every Mac podcaster wishes macOS shipped with. Drag in sources, drag in outputs, connect them with virtual cables, and feed the result to any recording app as a single device.

Pick SquadCast if

You’re building around reliable remote recording. SquadCast was always the dependable, less flashy sibling to Riverside, and the Descript acquisition has only sharpened that role. Progressive uploads work as advertised — recordings survive connection drops that would destroy a Zoom call.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Loopback alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Loopback do better than SquadCast?

Loopback's standout is "Virtual aggregate audio devices done right". SquadCast doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Progressive uploads survive connection drops" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Loopback; if the second does, pick SquadCast.

What are the trade-offs?

Loopback: $99 is a lot for a routing utility. SquadCast: standalone identity blurred post-acquisition. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Do they support the same platforms?

Loopback works on macOS where SquadCast doesn't. SquadCast works on Web where Loopback doesn't. If you're on a specific OS or device, that may decide for you.

Can I use Loopback and SquadCast together?

Both are recording tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Loopback for one show or episode type and SquadCast for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.