Head-to-head comparison

Podcast.co vs RSS.com

Two of the hosting tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

UK-rooted host with team workflows and private podcast support.

Best for: UK teams and private podcasts

Genuinely free podcast hosting that monetizes through ads and premium upgrades.

Best for: Free-tier hosting

At a glance

Field
Podcast.co
RSS.com
Best for
UK teams and private podcasts
Free-tier hosting
Price tier
Freemiumverify
Platforms
Web
WebiOSAndroid
Audience
Small teamsAgenciesEnterprise
Solo creatorsSmall teams

The honest trade-offs

Podcast.co

Pros

  • Strong team collaboration features
  • Solid private podcast and SSO support
  • UK-based with GDPR-friendly hosting

Watch-outs

  • More expensive than US entry hosts
  • Smaller brand presence outside the UK
  • Enterprise SSO is request-only

RSS.com

Pros

  • Free tier with unlimited episodes, no time limit
  • Auto-distribution to major directories
  • AI transcription included

Watch-outs

  • Monetization shallower than Acast
  • Interface less polished than rivals
  • Premium upsells throughout the UI

Which one should you pick?

Pick Podcast.co if

You’re building around uk teams and private podcasts. Podcast.co is a UK-rooted host that does well with team workflows and corporate/internal podcasting — a niche the bigger US hosts overlook.

Pick RSS.com if

You’re building around free-tier hosting. RSS.com is one of the few hosts whose free tier is actually usable as a permanent home — unlimited episodes and no time limit beats Buzzsprout's 90-day window outright.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Podcast.co alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Podcast.co do better than RSS.com?

Podcast.co's standout is "Strong team collaboration features". RSS.com doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Free tier with unlimited episodes, no time limit" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Podcast.co; if the second does, pick RSS.com.

What are the trade-offs?

Podcast.co: more expensive than us entry hosts. RSS.com: monetization shallower than acast. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Do they support the same platforms?

RSS.com works on iOS, Android where Podcast.co doesn't. If you're on a specific OS or device, that may decide for you.

Can I use Podcast.co and RSS.com together?

Both are hosting tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Podcast.co for one show or episode type and RSS.com for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.