Head-to-head comparison

Riverside vs WaveLab Cast

Two of the recording tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Browser-based studio that records each guest locally in 4K, then helps you edit.

Best for: Remote video interviews

Steinberg's podcast-focused audio editor with multitrack recording and direct upload to hosts.

Best for: Steinberg loyalists

At a glance

Field
Riverside
WaveLab Cast
Best for
Remote video interviews
Steinberg loyalists
Price tier
Platforms
WebmacOSWindowsiOSAndroid
macOSWindows
Audience
Solo creatorsSmall teamsAgencies
Solo creatorsSmall teams

The honest trade-offs

Riverside

Pros

  • Local 4K tracks survive flaky Wi-Fi
  • Separate per-guest tracks by default
  • Live streaming and clip generation included

Watch-outs

  • Editing tools still lag Descript
  • Free tier ships with a watermark
  • Hours-based pricing punishes long-form

WaveLab Cast

Pros

  • Built on Steinberg's mature audio engine
  • Direct upload to Spreaker, Podbean, SoundCloud
  • 30-day free trial of the full app

Watch-outs

  • Smaller community and fewer tutorials
  • Less narrative-focused than Hindenburg
  • Mac and Windows only

Which one should you pick?

Pick Riverside if

You’re building around remote video interviews. Local recording is Riverside's whole identity, and it actually delivers — separate 4K tracks per guest, the file is on the device whether or not the Wi-Fi cooperates. The editor has improved but still trails Descript when you need real post.

Pick WaveLab Cast if

You’re building around steinberg loyalists. WaveLab Cast 2 is the underrated podcast tool from a serious audio company. Same engine as Steinberg's mastering flagship, with direct upload to Spreaker, Podbean, and SoundCloud.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Riverside alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Riverside do better than WaveLab Cast?

Riverside's standout is "Local 4K tracks survive flaky Wi-Fi". WaveLab Cast doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Built on Steinberg's mature audio engine" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Riverside; if the second does, pick WaveLab Cast.

What are the trade-offs?

Riverside: editing tools still lag descript. WaveLab Cast: smaller community and fewer tutorials. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Do they support the same platforms?

Riverside works on Web, iOS, Android where WaveLab Cast doesn't. If you're on a specific OS or device, that may decide for you.

Can I use Riverside and WaveLab Cast together?

Both are recording tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Riverside for one show or episode type and WaveLab Cast for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.