Head-to-head comparison

Soundtrap vs SquadCast

Two of the recording tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Spotify-owned browser DAW with collaborative recording and one-click podcast publishing to Spotify.

Best for: Spotify-first podcasters

Remote recording with progressive local uploads, now bundled with Descript.

Best for: Reliable remote recording

At a glance

Field
Soundtrap
SquadCast
Best for
Spotify-first podcasters
Reliable remote recording
Price tier
Freemiumverify
Platforms
Web
Web
Audience
Solo creatorsSmall teams
Solo creatorsSmall teamsAgencies

The honest trade-offs

Soundtrap

Pros

  • Real-time collaborative editing in the browser
  • Direct upload to Spotify with transcripts
  • Free tier exists; works on any device

Watch-outs

  • Recording is cloud-based, not local lossless
  • Strongest features assume Spotify hosting
  • Pricing climbs past $14/mo for podcast features

SquadCast

Pros

  • Progressive uploads survive connection drops
  • Separate tracks per participant
  • Bundled with Descript editing in some plans

Watch-outs

  • Standalone identity blurred post-acquisition
  • Video quality trails Riverside slightly
  • Browser-only for guests, no native app

Which one should you pick?

Pick Soundtrap if

You’re building around spotify-first podcasters. Soundtrap is the browser DAW Spotify quietly built into a podcast tool. Collaboration genuinely works in real time, and the direct upload to Spotify is convenient if you publish there.

Pick SquadCast if

You’re building around reliable remote recording. SquadCast was always the dependable, less flashy sibling to Riverside, and the Descript acquisition has only sharpened that role. Progressive uploads work as advertised — recordings survive connection drops that would destroy a Zoom call.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Soundtrap alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Soundtrap do better than SquadCast?

Soundtrap's standout is "Real-time collaborative editing in the browser". SquadCast doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Progressive uploads survive connection drops" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Soundtrap; if the second does, pick SquadCast.

What are the trade-offs?

Soundtrap: recording is cloud-based, not local lossless. SquadCast: standalone identity blurred post-acquisition. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Can I use Soundtrap and SquadCast together?

Both are recording tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Soundtrap for one show or episode type and SquadCast for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.