Head-to-head comparison

Chartmetric vs CoHost

Two of the analytics tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

Cross-platform audio analytics with podcast and music intelligence.

Best for: Music-adjacent creators

B2B-focused analytics with prefix tracking and audience attribution.

Best for: B2B podcasters

At a glance

Field
Chartmetric
CoHost
Best for
Music-adjacent creators
B2B podcasters
Price tier
Platforms
Web
Web
Audience
Solo creatorsSmall teamsAgencies
Small teamsAgencies

The honest trade-offs

Chartmetric

Pros

  • Strong cross-platform music and chart data
  • Tracks Spotify, Apple, YouTube, social together
  • Historical chart data going back years

Watch-outs

  • Podcast features are thin next to music
  • Doesn't replace hosting analytics
  • Premium tier at $140/mo is steep for casual use

CoHost

Pros

  • Reveals companies and job titles of listeners
  • Works as prefix on existing hosting
  • Tracking links unify marketing attribution

Watch-outs

  • B2B features pointless for consumer shows
  • Smaller audience database than enterprise tools
  • Prefix-only setup feels limiting at higher tiers

Which one should you pick?

Pick Chartmetric if

You’re building around music-adjacent creators. Chartmetric is a music-first analytics platform that bolted on podcast charting almost as an afterthought — it tracks chart positions and cross-platform reach but doesn't replace a hosting analytics dashboard. If you're a podcaster who also releases music, it's genuinely useful.

Pick CoHost if

You’re building around b2b podcasters. CoHost nails the niche nobody else owns — B2B analytics that tell you which companies your listeners actually work at. If you're running a thought-leadership podcast for sales pipeline, it's the closest thing to LinkedIn-style attribution for audio.

Also worth comparing

Or see all Chartmetric alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does Chartmetric do better than CoHost?

Chartmetric's standout is "Strong cross-platform music and chart data". CoHost doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Reveals companies and job titles of listeners" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick Chartmetric; if the second does, pick CoHost.

What are the trade-offs?

Chartmetric: podcast features are thin next to music. CoHost: b2b features pointless for consumer shows. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Can I use Chartmetric and CoHost together?

Both are analytics tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using Chartmetric for one show or episode type and CoHost for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.