Head-to-head comparison

CoHost vs Listen Notes API

Two of the analytics tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

B2B-focused analytics with prefix tracking and audience attribution.

Best for: B2B podcasters

Search API across 3.7M+ podcasts used by 12,000+ companies.

Best for:

At a glance

Field
CoHost
Listen Notes API
Best for
B2B podcasters
Price tier
Freemiumverify
Platforms
Web
Web
Audience
Small teamsAgencies
Solo creators

The honest trade-offs

CoHost

Pros

  • Reveals companies and job titles of listeners
  • Works as prefix on existing hosting
  • Tracking links unify marketing attribution

Watch-outs

  • B2B features pointless for consumer shows
  • Smaller audience database than enterprise tools
  • Prefix-only setup feels limiting at higher tiers

Listen Notes API

Pros

  • Long-standing, reliable API used by many tools
  • Free tier sufficient for prototypes
  • Markdown OpenAPI doc useful for AI agents

Watch-outs

  • Listener metrics are estimates, not first-party
  • Pricing climbs sharply at higher tiers
  • Smaller transcript depth than Podscan

Which one should you pick?

Pick CoHost if

You’re building around b2b podcasters. CoHost nails the niche nobody else owns — B2B analytics that tell you which companies your listeners actually work at. If you're running a thought-leadership podcast for sales pipeline, it's the closest thing to LinkedIn-style attribution for audio.

Pick Listen Notes API if

You’re building around . Listen Notes is the long-running search and metadata API for podcasts. Reliable, well-documented, the API a lot of other podcast tools quietly depend on.

Also worth comparing

Or see all CoHost alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does CoHost do better than Listen Notes API?

CoHost's standout is "Reveals companies and job titles of listeners". Listen Notes API doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Long-standing, reliable API used by many tools" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick CoHost; if the second does, pick Listen Notes API.

What are the trade-offs?

CoHost: b2b features pointless for consumer shows. Listen Notes API: listener metrics are estimates, not first-party. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Can I use CoHost and Listen Notes API together?

Both are analytics tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using CoHost for one show or episode type and Listen Notes API for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.