Head-to-head comparison

CoHost vs Podscan.fm

Two of the analytics tools podcasters reach for. Here's how they differ on pricing, features, audience, and the trade-offs that actually matter day-to-day.

B2B-focused analytics with prefix tracking and audience attribution.

Best for: B2B podcasters

Podcast intelligence platform with full transcript search and alerts.

Best for:

At a glance

Field
CoHost
Podscan.fm
Best for
B2B podcasters
Price tier
Freemiumverify
Platforms
Web
Web
Audience
Small teamsAgencies
Solo creators

The honest trade-offs

CoHost

Pros

  • Reveals companies and job titles of listeners
  • Works as prefix on existing hosting
  • Tracking links unify marketing attribution

Watch-outs

  • B2B features pointless for consumer shows
  • Smaller audience database than enterprise tools
  • Prefix-only setup feels limiting at higher tiers

Podscan.fm

Pros

  • Near real-time transcript alerts for brand mentions
  • Large active monitoring catalogue
  • REST API and MCP server for AI assistants

Watch-outs

  • Transcript accuracy varies on accents or technical jargon
  • API costs scale fast with usage
  • Solo creator use cases overlap with cheaper Listen Notes plans

Which one should you pick?

Pick CoHost if

You’re building around b2b podcasters. CoHost nails the niche nobody else owns — B2B analytics that tell you which companies your listeners actually work at. If you're running a thought-leadership podcast for sales pipeline, it's the closest thing to LinkedIn-style attribution for audio.

Pick Podscan.fm if

You’re building around . Podscan.fm is the brand-monitoring tool for podcasts: near real-time transcripts of millions of episodes, with alerts when your keywords show up.

Also worth comparing

Or see all CoHost alternatives.

Frequently asked

What does CoHost do better than Podscan.fm?

CoHost's standout is "Reveals companies and job titles of listeners". Podscan.fm doesn't make that promise — it leans into "Near real-time transcript alerts for brand mentions" instead. If the first sentence describes your workflow, pick CoHost; if the second does, pick Podscan.fm.

What are the trade-offs?

CoHost: b2b features pointless for consumer shows. Podscan.fm: transcript accuracy varies on accents or technical jargon. Whether either matters depends entirely on what you actually need — neither is a deal-breaker by itself.

Can I use CoHost and Podscan.fm together?

Both are analytics tools so most teams pick one. Some workflows do combine them — for example, using CoHost for one show or episode type and Podscan.fm for another. Worth trying both free tiers before committing.